SWBAT analyze and summarize the required case Brown v. Board of Education, as well as apply its precedent to new scenarios.
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Access the assignment Equal Protection and Affirmative Action. Use the embedded links to complete a case summary for the comparison case assigned to your table group. We will be moving to color groups to share the related cases. Upon completion of this discussion, we will return to our table groups to apply any precedents to new situations.
1. Read American Politics Today pages 152-158
0 Comments
Objective:
SWBAT analyze and summarize the required case Brown v. Board of Education, as well as apply its precedent to new cases.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Use the embedded Interactive Notebook to complete the case analysis for this required landmark case. Be sure to adhere to the expectations associated with each directive, using details and substantive examples. As always, complete this assignment by summarizing it in your own words.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 145-151
2. Define/Contextualize through protectionism Work on the SCOTUS Movie Poster/Trailer and Study for the AP Test:)
Objective:SWBAT analyze and describe a required Supreme Court Case, as well as create a product that demonstrates their understanding of the information. Warm-up:Go to Quizlet.live, then enter the code provided, and register your first name with last initial when prompted. Classwork:Access and follow the attached instructions to highlight a required Supreme Court Case (sign up for a specific case using the attached link). The rubric and a sample have been attached for your convenience. Your final product should be uploaded to the discussion board by the due date (no late submissions will be accepted). A separate product grade for your project will be reported in HAC. The discussion board counts as a process grade based on completion and valuable participation. We will view each other's submissions during class on Friday, April 12. At that time you will be required to comment substantially on at least three projects, including praise (a compliment), polish (a suggestion), and a question that occurred to you as you viewed/listened. Homework:Work on your Movie Poster/Trailer and Continue to Prepare for the AP Test:)
Objective:
SWBAT demonstrate an understanding of terms and concepts related to the Civil Liberties.
Warm-up:
Go to Quizlet.live, then enter the code provided, and register your first name with last initial when prompted.
Classwork - Vocabulary Quiz:
Classwork - Saturday Study Session Poll:Classwork - McDonald v. Chicago:Classwork - Assault Weapons Ban:
Step 1: Introduction
What is Deliberation? Deliberation teaches people how to cooperatively discuss controversial issues by carefully considering multiple perspectives and searching for consensus. Why are we Deliberating? Talking across differences helps create an informed citizenry, which is essential to a democratic society. By learning to weigh evidence, consider competing views, form an opinion, articulate that opinion, and respond to those who disagree, we expand our knowledge. We work cooperatively toward a policy that benefits our community. Step 2: Careful Reading
Step 3: Clarification of Topic and Assigned Roles Step 4(a): With your table, select and record two reasons supporting your initial side. Step 4(b): Take notes when the other side presents. Step 5: (a) Highlight the best reason you heard from the other side. (b) Then, add one additional reason from the reading to support your new side. (c) Take notes when the other side presents. Have a wonderful weekend:)Objective:
SWBAT describe limitations that can be placed on the right to bear arms, analyze multiple perspectives and deliberate the issue of an assault weapons ban.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork - Application:
Access the McDonald v. Chicago case and apply the precedent to new scenarios.
Classwork - Deliberation:
Step 1: Introduction
What is Deliberation? Deliberation teaches people how to cooperatively discuss controversial issues by carefully considering multiple perspectives and searching for consensus. Why are we Deliberating? Talking across differences helps create an informed citizenry, which is essential to a democratic society. By learning to weigh evidence, consider competing views, form an opinion, articulate that opinion, and respond to those who disagree, we expand our knowledge. We work cooperatively toward a policy that benefits our community. Step 2: Careful Reading
Homework:
1. Study Chapter 4 Vocabulary using 2 Quizlet methods then test yourself. If you score below 70% repeat the process
Make time to study for the AP Test:)
Objective:
SWBAT analyze McDonald v. City of Chicago and describe limitations that can be placed on the right to bear arms.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Use the embedded Interactive Notebook to complete the case analysis for this required landmark case. Be sure to adhere to the expectations associated with each directive, using details and substantive examples. As always, complete this assignment by summarizing it in your own words. We will be applying the precedent from this case to new proposals.
Homework:
Study Chapter 4 Vocabulary using 2 Quizlet methods then test yourself. If you score below 70% repeat the process:)
Make time to study for the AP Test:)Objective:
SWBAT describe the arguments in the landmark required case Gideon v. Wainwright, as well as evaluate the impact of the decision.
Warm-up:
Enter your name and complete the following assignment about Gideon v. Wainwright.
Classwork:
Use the excerpt from Gideon's Trumpet to respond to the questions about the required case Gideon v. Wainwright (Day 1). Then access the charts about the public defender system to evaluate the impact of this landmark ruling (Day 2).
The Right to an Attorney:Objective:
SWBAT describe the arguments in the landmark required case Gideon v. Wainwright, as well as evaluate the impact of the decision.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Use the excerpt from Gideon's Trumpet to respond to the questions about the required case Gideon v. Wainwright (Day 1). Then access the charts about the public defender system to evaluate the impact of this landmark ruling (Day 2).
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 135-137
2. Define/Contextualize through Roe v. Wade Objective:
SWBAT demonstrate an understanding of liberties outlined in the First Amendment.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
You have 40 to respond to the assigned FRQs. Unless the directions indicate otherwise respond to all parts of the questions. It is suggested that you take a few minutes to plan and outline your answer. In your response, use substantive examples (referencing vocabulary, founding documents, current events and/or court cases) where appropriate.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 135-137
2. Define/Contextualize through Roe v. Wade Objective:
SWBAT analyze the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Religious Clauses in the First Amendment, as well as prepare to apply the precedents to new scenarios.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Upon completion of the case analysis, we will be moving to color groups to discuss comparison cases, then returning to our table groups to share and apply the precedents.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 126-134
2. Define/Contextualize through Gideon v. Wainwright |
Essential Questions:In what ways does the Constitution attempt to limit abuse of government powers? ResourcesArchives
March 2024
|