SWBAT analyze McDonald v. City of Chicago and describe limitations that can be placed on the right to bear arms.
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
In the Schoology Resource folder for this week, you will find a page titled "Second Amendment Application Activity." The embedded presentation includes four proposals designed to reduce gun violence. For each, determine whether you would personally support the proposal and give your reasoning. Next, work collaboratively to determine whether, based on the guidance provided by the Supreme Court in Heller (points 1–4 on the fourth slide), the Court would find each proposal to be constitutional or unconstitutional and give your reasoning.
1. Study Chapter 4 Vocabulary using 2 Quizlet methods then test yourself. If you score below 70% repeat the process
0 Comments
Objective:
SWBAT analyze McDonald v. City of Chicago and describe limitations that can be placed on the right to bear arms.
Warm-up:
After reviewing the Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Use the embedded Interactive Notebook to complete the case analysis for this required landmark case. Be sure to adhere to the expectations associated with each directive, using details and substantive examples. As always, complete this assignment by summarizing it in your own words. We will be applying the precedent from this case to new proposals.
Homework:
1. Complete Inquizitive (alternative assignment: Outline or FRQ)
Objective:
SWBAT explain the relationship between Roe v. Wade and the Bill of Rights, as well as apply the decision to a new scenario.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Access "Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt" in the Resource folder on Schoology. We will be applying the ruling in Roe v. Wade using the following deliberation method.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 135-137
2. Define/Contextualize through Roe v. Wade Objective:
SWBAT explain the relationship between Roe v. Wade and the Bill of Rights, as well as apply the decision to a new scenario.
Warm-up:
Move to the FRQ written by an adjacent table:
Prepare to discuss and defend the grade you have assigned. Classwork:
Use the embedded Interactive Notebook to complete the case analysis for this required landmark case. Be sure to adhere to the expectations associated with each directive, using details and substantive examples. As always, complete this assignment by summarizing it in your own words. We will be engaging in a structured deliberation that requires an application of this case tomorrow.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 126-134
2. Define/Contextualize through Gideon v. Wainwright Exit Slip - Classifying Arguments:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Objective:
SWBAT analyze the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Religious Clauses in the First Amendment, as well as prepare to apply the precedents to new scenarios.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Each Table Group has been assigned a separate comparison case. You will have 20 minutes to work together to respond to the Case Comparison FRQ on the chart paper provided. When the time has expired, each group will hang their FRQ Response and move to the FRQ to the right. Based on your understanding of the question and knowledge of the required cases, your Table Group will be scoring the FRQ to the right.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 124-126
2. Define/Contextualize through McDonald v. Chicago AP Exam Review:
Objective:
SWBAT analyze the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Religious Clauses in the First Amendment, as well as prepare to apply the precedents to new scenarios.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Access the assignment titled Freedom of Religion on Schoology. Use the embedded Interactive Notebook to complete the case analysis for the two required landmark cases related to the religious clauses of the first amendment. Be sure to adhere to the expectations associated with each directive, using details and substantive examples. As always, complete this assignment by summarizing in your own words. We will be completing an FRQ related to these cases on Monday, so make sure to arrive prepared.
Have a wonderful weekend:)Objective:
SWBAT describe required landmark cases, as well as explain when and to what degree schools can limit students.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Work with your TABLE group as you analyze one case and prepare to describe the circumstances. Once every group has explained their case, we will apply what we have learned to a new scenario. Every case has been hyperlinked in the document and in the Resource Folder for this week. An interactive notebook provides additional summaries, videos, and podcasts for the required cases.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 113-124
2.Define/Contextualize through due Miller Test Objective:
SWBAT describe required landmark cases, as well as explain when and to what degree schools can limit students.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Incorporation Doctrine Case Comparison:
Rejoin your COLOR group and collaborate to convey the facts of your assigned case. Upon completion comparison case notes, differentiate between selective and total incorporation.
Student Rights:
Work with your TABLE group as you analyze one case and prepare to describe the circumstances. Once every group has explained their case, we will apply what we have learned to a new scenario. Every case has been hyperlinked in the document and in the Resource Folder for this week. An interactive notebook provides additional summaries, videos, and podcasts for the required cases.
Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 108-113
2.Define/Contextualize through Wisconsin v Yoder Objective:
SWBAT discuss how the US Constitution protects individual liberties and rights, as well as explain the implications of selective incorporation.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Access the Incorporation Doctrine assignment. Read the Congressional Debates on the 14th Amendment and respond to the remaining questions. Discuss your answers within your group. Prepare to share your analysis with the class. Once with have analyzed the historical context, you will join your color group to analyze Supreme Court cases that demonstrate the evolution of the 14th Amendment.
Comparison Cases:
Red: Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Blue: Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) Yellow: Gitlow v. New York (1922) Green: Palko v. Connecticut (1937) Homework:Objective:
SWBAT discuss how the US Constitution protects individual liberties and rights, as well as explain the implications of selective incorporation.
Warm-up:
Respond to this Menti Survey using the instructions below or by following this link.
Classwork:
Access the Selective Incorporation Assignment in Schoology. Use the images posted in the Resource Folder to respond to questions related to the 14th Amendment. Discuss your answers within your group. Prepare to share your analysis with the class.
Comparison Cases:
Red: Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Blue: Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) Yellow: Gitlow v. New York (1922) Green: Palko v. Connecticut (1937) Homework:
1. Read American Politics Today pages 98-104
2. Define/Contextualize through civil liberties |
Essential Questions:In what ways does the Constitution attempt to limit abuse of government powers? ResourcesArchives
April 2024
|